Tuesday, November 14, 2023

 

Stones and Windshields

 

 

What is it about stones and the big trucks carrying them that demands the two always end up to no good while I am on the road? Surely, operators and/or owners of gravel trucks must understand that loads of gravel must be covered and the covers must be secured to prevent loose stones damaging my windshield. Perhaps I am overconfident in my assessment of the businessmen who demand over--full loads of gravel and undersized covers that are securely in place.

Whatever. I only know that this week I was struck again with a golf-ball sized stone that came barreling at me from a large gravel truck. My poor windshield didn’t stand a chance.


Here is my windshield today.



I just learned that broken or damaged windshields are the number one insurance claim in the US with 30 % of all insurance claims going for repair of broken or damaged windshields. 

 The windshield manufacturers own a share of the problem. The largest share of claims (70 to 80%) for broken windshields comes from damage at the edge of the glass that results in a crack that grows from the edge to a central part of the windshield. This kind of damage is preventable and easily fixed with low-cost remedies. This damage is caused by residual stress in the glass when it is manufactured and installed. [The manufacturers do not like talking about this so there is little more that I can tell you. The best information on this topic comes from the Insurance Journal .com.]

I am now waiting for a new windshield to be installed at my expense. Why – because the insurance company that I send monthly checks to reminded me that sometime in the distant past I opted for a $500 deductible clause to my policy – an amount only slightly higher than my cost for installation of a new windshield. Happy Birthday, Bill.

Thursday, November 2, 2023

 

 

SAVING THE GREAT LAKES*

 

 

One of the many issues facing Michigan’s Governor comes to her from a Canadian business. This firm is Enbridge, a Canadian multinational pipeline and energy company headquartered in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Enbridge owns and operates pipelines throughout Canada and the United States, transporting crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids from the far west of Canada to and through the United States. Founded in 1949, more recently the company has also entered the newly-found business of generating renewable energy as they seek to improve their profit margins and increase their presence in creating energy as well as just moving it.

Enbridge's pipeline system is the longest in North America and the largest oil export pipeline network in the world (See map on a following page), thus affording them considerable influence in both Canadian and U.S. politics. Recently, President Biden and Prime Minister Trudeau were involved in talks but Biden declined to discuss Enbridge’s unwelcome legal challenges to Michigan’s Governor Gretchen Witmer.

Enbridge pipelines for crude oil are 17,809 miles long while Its 23,800 miles of natural gas pipelines connects multiple Canadian provinces, several US states, and the Gulf of Mexico. Enbridge has evolved a naming and or numbering system for each of its major pipelines. Their ‘line five’ pipeline is the object of this paper as it runs from Superior Wisconsin across Michigan’s Upper Peninsula and then under water at the Straits of Mackinaw, thence overland to its refinery in Sarnia, Canada.

The bane of petroleum pipelines are leaks (often called spills by the industry). The poisonous gases and oils pumped through pipelines quickly spread from ruptured pipelines to the surrounding substrata causing contamination of soils and water from the toxic oils and gases.

 

*Much of this article was prepared by Traverse City writer BARBARA STAMIRIS on MAY 6, 2023

 

The effluent can be responsible for killing wildlife, fouling beaches, and poisoning water tables that are often the source of drinking water.

Enbridge has been responsible for several oil spills, including spills on their lines 3, 5 and 6. A leak occurred on their line 3 on March 3 1991 when operators failed to shut down the pipeline for three hours after the pressure drop was first noticed. This spill was the largest ever in the history of the U.S. The Line 3 pipeline was also the origin of a 1.3 million-gallon oil spill in 1973, the second worst in Minnesota history.

 

Major pipelines in North America


Another Enbridge spill known as the ‘Kalamazoo River oil spill’ occurred in July 2010 when Enbridge’s Line 6B burst and flowed into a tributary of the Kalamazoo River near Marshall, Michigan. This pipeline carried heavy crude oil known as diluted bitumen. Following the spill, the volatile diluents evaporated, leaving the heavier bitumen to sink in the water. Thirty-five miles of the Kalamazoo River were closed for clean-up until June 2012, when portions of the river were re-opened. On March 14, 2013, the EPA ordered Enbridge to return to dredge portions of the river to remove submerged oil and oil-contaminated sediment.

Line 5 is an Enbridge pipeline that originates in Superior Wisconsin (just south of Duluth). The line traverses Michigan’s Upper Peninsula reaching the Straits of Mackinaw on its southeastern course. At the Straits, the builders of the line sent the line underwater at the Straits. The line then resumed its cross-country direction back toward Canada until it terminated in Sarnia where Enbridge has a refinery operation. Line 5 has leaked 33 times in Michigan lands and waterways as it carries oil to Sarnia. See the following map.



 

The upper reaches of Line 5 cross the Bad River tribal land. The Indians complained to the firm that the risk of leaks on their land had increased over the years, and besides, they said, the agreement to cross reservation lands ended in 2013: Enbridge continued to flow petroleum through the pipeline anyway The Indians sued and the judge ruled in favor of the Indians.

 

MADISON, Wis. -- A federal judge has given Enbridge three years to shut down parts of an oil pipeline that crosses reservation land and ordered the energy company to pay a Native American tribe more than $5 million for trespassing.

When Michigan Gov. Whitmer ordered Line 5 shut down in 2020 to protect the Great Lakes, she gave the company and the State of Michigan six months — until May 12, 2021— to develop a prudent decommissioning plan. Enbridge has announced it will defy her shutdown order, instead suing to keep Line 5. operating until a tunnel is completed that Enbridge says will help prevent leaks. — a project estimated to take 5–10 years. Enbridge sued to keep it operating, claiming that a 1977 treaty with the United States allowed them to continue pumping oil through the critical waterways. That lawsuit is still being litigated. While Enbridge lawsuits drag on, Line 5—well beyond its 50-year design life—continues to bring in billions by operating in defiance of the state order.

Now 70 years old, Line 5 is the world’s most dangerous pipeline due to its degraded condition and its position among our unique Great Lakes.

Michigan Senator Gary Peters supported the Governor’s action and conducted a hearing on the topic. Experts who testified at the hearing called the Mackinac Straits “the worst location in the U.S. for an oil pipeline.” Its condition in this sensitive location makes Line 5 the most dangerous pipeline in the U.S. and in the world. No other pipeline endangers 20 percent of Earth’s freshwater, 700 miles of shoreline, and the drinking water of 40 million. Yet Enbridge chooses the 70-year-old Great Lakes route instead of its seven-year-old land-based route to Sarnia.

Why is Line 5 so dangerous? In a busy shipping lane, anchor strikes are inevitable. The many freighters that traverse the Straits are the cause of anchor strikes that can and do, pull the pipeline from its moorings. Warnings are ineffective, since dropping an anchor is an emergency measure. In 2018, an anchor struck Line 5 pulling the pipeline off its moorings for several feet.

But anchor strikes are not the only risk to the pipeline. The Straits’ water currents, 10 times stronger than Niagara Falls, scoured away Line 5’s bottomland support on several locations. As a result, Line 5 requires 219 remedial supports which suspend it, causing new problems. Line 5 now sways in the currents, causing bending and vibrational stress. A suspended pipeline represents a completely new design, requiring engineering review and approval that it never got. Keep in mind that the pipeline was never designed to move and bend when it was originally designed over 70 years ago.

When the pipeline rubbed against the supports, its safety coatings were scraped off—damage Enbridge failed to report for three years. In 2020, extensive damage to one of the supports led to months of shutdown. Enbridge said its own vessel caused the isolated incident, yet forceful currents from record-high lake levels could have caused the displacement and affected other supports.
An Enbridge pipeline around the lakes, rebuilt and expanded after the Kalamazoo spill, reopened in 2015 with excess capacity, but Enbridge chooses to continue using the line through the Straits where it is positioned directly under the Big Mac Bridge.

Another strategy that keeps Line open is Enbridge’s insistence that building a tunnel under the water will make Line 5 safer to operate. Knowing that Line 5 is obsolete, Enbridge said a tunnel would replace it by 2024. In late 2023, the US Army Corps has announced a delay in its review of a tunnel proposal which pushed tunnel completion to 2030. If a tunnel is built, Line 5 would be nearing 80 years old. If the tunnel is not approved, Enbridge has said it will continue to operate old Line 5..

Enbridge publicly promotes a tunnel as the solution for Line 5, but its internal plans differ. In the 2018 tunnel agreement with outgoing Gov. Snyder, Enbridge made sure it could back out without penalty—a wise move since an oil tunnel is not a safe investment today. This may explain why Enbridge’s Board of Directors has not approved the tunnel and no money is allocated for a tunnel in its annual Security & Exchange Commission Reports meant to inform shareholders of upcoming projects. Enbridge has no plan or date for decommissioning Line 5. They appear to believe that they can operated the old line forever

While Enbridge avoids risk, taxpayers must fund years of state and federal review for a tunnel that is unlikely to be built.

In Ottawa this past March, Biden told Trudeau we’re “two countries with one heart.” If the Great Lakes are that heart, warnings of a deteriorated and anchor-struck pipeline, like warnings of a heart attack, cannot be ignored. And yet mention of Line 5 was politely avoided.

Biden remained silent about Trudeau siding with Enbridge and opening court case based on a 1977 treaty. The treaty asserts that Line 5 can’t be shut down by Michigan, that the U.S. must transport Canada’s oil against our own environmental and economic interests.

National Geographic says the Great Lakes are “the irreplaceable fragile ecosystem…that our planet needs to survive.” An oil spill here would have global implications; yet, unlike other climate threats, this one can be solved by turning off a valve. While the fix itself is easy, the politics are not. One thing is certain, Enbridge should not get to decide on a risk that endangers the citizens of Michigan and the fisheries in the Great Lakes.

From a planetary perspective, it’s a no-brainer. If the world’s most dangerous pipeline has an easy solution, get the oil out of the water. Now.

Barbara Stamiris is an environmental activist living in Traverse City